I guess Mama corrected me on a fine point.
Actually I should have made this point clearer.
You see, a meat butcher does not need to know what spices vegetarian likes. The same way, a normal heterosexual men does not need to know what non sex object women want. At least on a libertarian regime. That’s what I mean.
Say only 5% of women are sex objects and like it.
Well, those 5% are your target market.
The other 95% is totally irrelevant. Even if you were wrong. Say they did not like to be sex objects. So what? They’re not your target market. You’re not going to deal with them anyway. 95% is a type of error that doesn’t matter (I forget type 1 or type 2).
For that reason, men tend to think that women are sex object. We pay nothing for being wrong.
I see western civilization is becoming more like Spartan where the only one that breed is the one that break the rules by going out of barracks. Spartans were very proud of their tradition. Their birth rate also plummeted because of that and so was their hegemony.
Obviously women need to be a sex object in order to reproduce. Women are descendants of women that become sex objects.
So, that number is not 5%. That number is more like 80%-95% in my opinion.
Another reason why I advocated that we all think that women as sex object is because when we don’t, again and again, I see that she ended up being sex objects anyway, on the hand of some lesser males that value her freedom far less than us.
For example, say American males do not import third world women into becoming sex workers in US. Then those women will ended up staying in a poor country with her clits cut and forced to wear burqha and stuff. However, if American males simply allow those women to be a stripper, for example, then all beautiful girls all over the world will be free from oppression. Any countries that insist on oppressing them will see their prettiest girls go to US. Of course, american females won’t allow it because they too hate competition.
By the way, did you read the articles I mentioned?
He said about every time a guy commit polygamy with 3 women he deprived 2 men out of women. Actually he’s wrong. The main reason why a reasonably rich male in rich countries cannot get laid is not because of polygamists. The main reason is that feminazis prohibit importing those women to rich countries. That’s the real reason behind laws against women trafficking. After all, if force or fraud is involved in women trafficking, we already have laws against force, fraud, or rape right?
However I showed you the article so that you know what the real problem is. I know libertarianism do not like to generalize people. Libertarian expect to treat everyone equally. However, it’s still important, I think, to know what humans typically behave. Now that’s what evolutionary psychology is all about. Knowing that will help us understand what’s really behind religious bigotry, feminazis, etc. It’s not what they always says. It’s actually very far fetches.
And yea prohibited activity are not prohibited because no body could possibly want it. Most of the time, it’s prohibited because TOO MANY want it.
Now I need a female opinion on this because all the other males here don’t seem to agree with me.
Mama, you’re new here. What do you think? Now not only you’re more than sex object, you could be the only actual libertarian female expert on what females want here.
Why Men Should Think of Women as Sex Objects is a post from: Free Market Forever